Are PlayToEarn Games Ponzi Schemes?

Many are comparing Web3 projects with Ponzis without realizing that even some of the most important countries are making the same mistakes. 

Reckless Hyperinflation

According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds from new investors. To avoid being compared to one, blockchain games must start paying close attention to their economic models.

Although this comparison seems fair, poorly designed Play— and MoveToEarn games are more akin to countries with high inflation or hyperinflation. But, of course, many early participants in games like Axie or STEPN have only seen the bright side of an expanding money supply if they sold in time. 

As new users enter these economies, the exponential demand for in-game digital assets rises faster than the downward pressure from selling them. This lets early users sell the tokens they earn while prices keep rising. But games (and countries) eventually reach a point where exponential growth fades.


For this reason, balancing token supply and demand is key to creating sustainable game economies. Therefore, every project that plans to survive long-term should now work on tightening excessive token printing, introducing non-stop burning mechanisms, and finding better ways to create organic demand. In addition, projects could look outside their game bubble to find new revenue streams – just like countries export their goods and services. 

Possible Solutions?

Less Token Printing

Generate more conservative monetary rewards: Digital assets should have a lower Return on investment (ROI). 

Stronger Burn Mechanisms 

Create additional token sinks: This goes in hand with lowering ROI. 

Make the end-game unreachable: Users should be incentivized to keep investing in the game, introducing new expansions with better units and abilities.

Introduce new sinks that don’t increase rewards: Players should be able to buy skins, weapons, or other in-game assets that make the experience more enjoyable rather than more profitable.

More Organic Demand

Bring more user value: Make the experience more enjoyable and create a stronger community. Games should be played because they are fun.

Incentivize player ownership further: Attach intangible value to players’ NFTs and develop a PlayAndOwn model. 

Create New Revenue Streams

Create a product for other Web3 projects: Projects can integrate each other in many ways. Examples include selling advertisements or digital real estate, incorporating characters, weapons, or other branded elements.

Create a product for users: This can go in hand with creating new sinks that don’t increase rewards. Examples include selling in-game or real-life goods and services, like accessories, toys, apparel, experiences, etc.


Many games, like Axie and Stepn, are already working toward implementing more sustainable models. The industry is very young, and there is much room to grow and experiment. It’s painful to go through these times, but building a healthy economy is necessary by leaving behind broken models. 

Although a bit far-fetched, GameFi developers can draw from real-life examples across history. In many cases, governments highjack their countries’ future by trying to patch up deeply rooted problems with temporary solutions. Reckless money printing is not the way to go. Web3 and the world economy are realizing it.

Source :

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *